王者荣耀
Proposed US rule barring China science collaboration sparks outcry from US scientists_我的网站
A | 8月26日消息，三星在Gamescom 2026展会上正式发布了全新的P系列移动固态硬盘，包含旗舰型号P9与耐用型号P7。 
China US Photo:VCGAmerican scientists have voiced opposition to a proposed rule which seeks to ban federal funding for US science collaboration with China, saying that it would instead hurt US interest, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday. Chinese experts also warned that the slew of US restrictions on China-US scientific cooperation is unlikely to deal a fatal blow to China's scientific development, but could instead backfire on the US.
The proposed Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rule, set to take effect in December, would mark one of the biggest overhauls of US science funding in decades, giving political appointees greater authority over grant awards previously guided by scientific peer review and requiring that they "advance the President's policy priorities," according to the Washington Post.
It would also effectively expand the 2011 Wolf Amendment, which bars scientists from using NASA funding for bilateral collaborations with China, to all federal agencies and scientists receiving federal funds, marking the largest break in US-China scientific engagement in decades, the US media outlet reported.
So far, the proposed rule has garnered nearly half a million public comments, many from scientists and leading US science bodies. A Washington Post analysis of 50,000 of those comments found that around 88 percent were negative.
The rule, initially set to take effect in October, was pushed back to December after a bipartisan stopgap funding bill temporarily halted its adoption. Unlike the Wolf Amendment, the rule does not require congressional approval to take effect.
"I do think there are still members of Congress who think we have a monopoly on knowledge. They think we're still in the Cold War Soviet era ... where we were ahead in most areas of science and technology. That is not the case with China. We are no longer the leader in many areas of science," said Tobin Smith, senior vice president for government relations and public policy at the Association for American Universities, which advocates on behalf of leading US research universities, per the Washington Post.
Scientists warn that the rule risks subjecting long-term scientific research to four-year political cycles. "We will not succeed if with every new administration we are ping-ponging back and forth about priorities," the American Association for the Advancement of Science said in a blistering comment, urging the administration to withdraw the rule. "Fast-tracking such profound changes ... hands an easy victory to nations like China," it said, the Washington Post reported.
This reflects a fundamental divide between the US government and the scientific community over how science should develop, Wang Yiwei, a professor at Renmin University of China's School of International Studies, told the Global Times. He noted that politicians tend to believe that suppressing China as a competitor would allow the US to preserve its market dominance and technological edge.
Scientists, however, tend to follow a different logic, as scientific progress depends on openness, exchanges and collaboration. If science and technology are driven solely by competition and private capital, with the ultimate goal of maintaining technological monopolies, this could create greater risks and ultimately undermine US interests as well, Wang said.
The proposed rule change is the latest salvo in a broader battle in Washington over how to respond to China's rise as a scientific superpower. In July, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) also moved to ban collaborations between scientist it funds and many Chinese research institutions and their employees, according to Science magazine.
Liu Shaoshan, director of the Center for Embodied AI at the Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society and a former US-based researcher, told the Global Times in a previous interview that the NSF's new proposed rules created a "talent wall," arguing that restrictions based on nationality, institutional affiliation, and research partnerships could reduce the global talent pool available to the US, weaken its ability to attract leading scientists, and slow scientific innovation.
Liu also said scientific advancement relies not only on discovery but also on the exchange, validation, and dissemination of knowledge.
Wang also said China has built significant strengths through its vast pool of scientists and engineers, complete industrial chains and massive application scenarios, while increasingly moving from application-oriented innovation toward original research. Against this backdrop, US technological blockades and restrictions on cooperation are unlikely to halt China's progress, but could instead isolate American scientists from China's latest research and collaboration opportunities. Such an approach could also prevent the two countries from leveraging their respective strengths and ultimately undermine US competitiveness, Wang said.
。
B | 其中三星P9成为全球首款在8TB超大容量下，通过USB4接口实现4000MB/s顺序读取速度的移动固态硬盘。
C |
据三星官方介绍，P9系列其顺序读取与写入速度分别高达4000MB/s和3800MB/s，性能表现是目前在售热门产品T9的两倍。
P9最大亮点便是搭载USB4传输协议，一举打破以往USB外接存储长期面临的带宽桎梏，再配合高度集成的自研控制器，整机实现了出色的温控表现，长时间高负载下性能输出更稳。 外观上，P9延续了三星移动硬盘一贯的紧凑设计，接口部分采用了加固处理的USB Type-C，而同期发布的P7则主打可靠性，虽然读写参数略逊于P9，但其外壳具备抗冲击能力，可承受1.8米跌落冲击。 目前P9、P7两款新品均提供1TB、2TB、4TB、8TB四种容量版本。
旗舰型号P9 pSSD售价方面，1TB售价339.99美元（约2291元人民币）、2TB售价649.99美元（约4379元人民币）、4TB售价1349.99美元（约9095元人民币）、8TB售价2699.99美元（约18190元人民币）。
D | 定位稍低的P7 pSSD售价方面，1TB售价289.99美元（约1954元人民币）、2TB售价549.99美元（约3705元人民币）、4TB售价1149.99美元（约7747元人民币）、8TB售价2289.99美元（约15428元人民币）。 全球开售日期定在8月31日，现阶段三星还没有公布两款产品的国行上市时间表以及国内售价。
【本文结束】如需转载请务必注明出处：
责任编辑：青山
文章内容举报
。
Current article:http://1ht.shangyaohujunwei.bond/g9w2bvp/dv67we.html
Published on:13:49:52
发表于 19:37:53 
QQ好友和群
QQ空间
腾讯微博
腾讯朋友
收藏
支持
反对
发表于 20:29:35 
